When you are in a large city or one that is large enough to have multiple fiber internet providers, finding the best one can be quite a challenge. Some cities, such as San Diego, can have as few as 1 provider, others like L.A. have several. And like any city, there are cities that have very good internet speeds, but are very cost-prohibitive to those in the middle of the country.
San Diego’s fiber internet provider is sacramento.com. I’m not sure if this is a coincidence, or if the fact that they are also the largest city in the country to have a fiber internet provider is something that only happens in San Diego, as it’s one of the few cities that has more than one provider.
Like many of the cities in the country, San Diego has a very high cost to have a fiber internet provider. It used to be that the only providers that could be had were in the larger cities, and now many smaller towns have their own providers. This is because the city of San Diego, like most cities, has a population that is spread out across the country, so any internet service provider must be able to accommodate these rural areas.
This makes it a difficult market for internet providers because they have to provide high-speed internet to everyone who wants it, without having to compete with each other. Because of this, San Diego’s fiber internet providers face a lot of competition. Some, like Fiberlink, will only accept business from their existing providers, which makes it difficult for newcomers. Others, like Charter, will only take new providers if they already have a fiber connection.
Fiberlink is a very small company with just a single fiber connection, while Charter has a much larger network. Charter has been able to get a lot of new customers because of their fiber connection, while Fiberlink is still trying to get its share.
Charter has been around longer than Fiberlink, and though they’ve had to deal with a lot of competition in the years since Fiberlink’s inception, it’s been a long time since they’ve been in a position where they needed fiber. But Charter has been making moves to catch up to Fiberlink in speed and reliability, while Fiberlink has been making sure that their fiber connection is reliable and fast.
When Charter went to build its fiber network, they needed to hire someone with some of the skills of Fiberlink’s engineers and they looked to Fiberlink’s CEO as their key person. He chose charter because it fit his long term vision of building a fiber network that was also reliable. However, Charter got its first fiber connection right after Fiberlink’s CEO left the company, and it’s been a while since Charter has been in a position where it needed fiber.
But what happens when Charter runs into fiber problems? First, it’ll need to hire a new Chief Technology Officer (CTO) while also having a few more engineers to be involved in the day-to-day operations of the network. That’s probably the biggest reason for the delay: Charter has already invested a lot of money in building Fiberlinks and it’s not going to take them a long time to make sure they’re ready to go.
Charter recently purchased a fiber optic cable for its customers and is still trying to figure out how to get that up and running. But the company has been looking for more bandwidth to run fiber to its customers instead of just those in the first 200 miles. And that’s been the problem with Charter’s fiber network. It will need to do a lot of work just to get its fiber lines up and running, and it will have to do it without the help of a company as large as Comcast.
The company is actually planning to offer faster speeds to its customers, so the only way to get its fiber lines up and running would be to get a company to build a fiber network and then have those lines pay for themselves. Comcast, of course, can’t be trusted to do that. Their ability to offer fast broadband has been limited ever since they tried to build their own cable companies, and it looks like Charter has no qualms about pulling a fast one on them in the name of speed.